Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Radical Individualist's avatar

This is a great list of articles.

I have reservations about fusion power. They've worked on it for decades and have accomplished little. And scaling up to useable levels seems very unlikely. It's a great idea in theory, but so is the tooth fairy.

Expand full comment
Meredith Trimble's avatar

Ironic that the fusion device is called a “mirror” device. Most fusion work appears to be nothing but smoke and mirrors. Lie#1:” tritium and deuterium fusion produces no radioactivity.”Most of the energy is in high energy neutrons which must be used to “breed” fission fuel or more tritium, both radioactive.

Lie#2: “containing plasma and heating it to ignite fusion can generate more energy than put in.” The only potential way to compress and heat plasma is to allow magnetic pinch to create a quantum effect which captures electrons injected for heating while reducing the cooling effect of X-rays that would otherwise occur. See the explanation at LPPFusion.com. Lie#3 “fusion power will be more efficient “. The most efficient way to harness electricity from a fusion reactor would be DC current. Large scale inverters would then be required to feed the grid, reducing overall efficiency while increasing cost and complexity.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts